After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these systems. Via lie recognition tools examined at the boundary to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/the-counseling-services-offers-free-confidential-counseling-services-to-enrolled-students just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to work these systems and to pursue their right for security.
It also demonstrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from accessing the channels of safeguards. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: while they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.